<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monopoly &#8211; Trade by Computer so Unfair !!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myblog.bloggybloggy.com/monopoly-unfair-computer-trade-08-12-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myblog.bloggybloggy.com/monopoly-unfair-computer-trade-08-12-2008/</link>
	<description>Bloggy Bloggy is a Portal to my College Life as it Happens and other cool stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumeet</title>
		<link>http://www.myblog.bloggybloggy.com/monopoly-unfair-computer-trade-08-12-2008/#comment-16511</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myblog.bloggybloggy.com/monopoly-trade-by-computer-so-unfair-08-12-2008/#comment-16511</guid>
		<description>Competition is good, but thing is , you cannot ever win , if even 1 player manages to secure 3 of the same kind color/property . Once that happens there is no way you will ever win, computer keeps landing on other computers property and that players gets richer and richer.

Best thing to do in this game is block other computer players from acquiring all the 3 properties else its game over for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition is good, but thing is , you cannot ever win , if even 1 player manages to secure 3 of the same kind color/property . Once that happens there is no way you will ever win, computer keeps landing on other computers property and that players gets richer and richer.</p>
<p>Best thing to do in this game is block other computer players from acquiring all the 3 properties else its game over for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.myblog.bloggybloggy.com/monopoly-unfair-computer-trade-08-12-2008/#comment-16430</link>
		<dc:creator>H.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 06:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myblog.bloggybloggy.com/monopoly-trade-by-computer-so-unfair-08-12-2008/#comment-16430</guid>
		<description>Yea, I&#039;ve played this game against the computer and it seems that it often conspires to avoid having the other computer player tokens land on my developed properties.  I&#039;ve had an entire side of the board developed before and watched three computer player tokens bypass every one of those properties twice around the board by landing on chance, community chess, etc., defying the most likely rolls on each pass.  Statistically, one might expect this to happen once out of every 10 or 20 games, but when it happens repeatedly, game after game, it starts to look like the game is programmed to cheat to keep the game competative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I&#8217;ve played this game against the computer and it seems that it often conspires to avoid having the other computer player tokens land on my developed properties.  I&#8217;ve had an entire side of the board developed before and watched three computer player tokens bypass every one of those properties twice around the board by landing on chance, community chess, etc., defying the most likely rolls on each pass.  Statistically, one might expect this to happen once out of every 10 or 20 games, but when it happens repeatedly, game after game, it starts to look like the game is programmed to cheat to keep the game competative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

